<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Planning for the New GoGrid Feature – MyGSIs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gogrid.com/2009/04/22/planning-for-the-new-gogrid-feature-%E2%80%93-personal-server-images/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gogrid.com/2009/04/22/planning-for-the-new-gogrid-feature-%e2%80%93-personal-server-images/</link>
	<description>&#34;Complex Infrastructure Made Easy™&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 09:46:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Ornelas</title>
		<link>http://blog.gogrid.com/2009/04/22/planning-for-the-new-gogrid-feature-%e2%80%93-personal-server-images/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Ornelas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gogrid.com/?p=908#comment-1889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A High Availability package deployment would be nice.  Two App servers, two database servers with load balance and cloud storage.  I would think customers would be more opt to choose this pre-configured package with the built in redunancy as opposed in doing a single server deployment and working towards a high availablity design. 
 
For GoGrid, this would mean a instance jump on increased fees from the user as they are using 4 servers vs. 1 server and the user is configured for a failover state.  A real win, win... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A High Availability package deployment would be nice.  Two App servers, two database servers with load balance and cloud storage.  I would think customers would be more opt to choose this pre-configured package with the built in redunancy as opposed in doing a single server deployment and working towards a high availablity design. </p>
<p>For GoGrid, this would mean a instance jump on increased fees from the user as they are using 4 servers vs. 1 server and the user is configured for a failover state.  A real win, win&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sheehan</title>
		<link>http://blog.gogrid.com/2009/04/22/planning-for-the-new-gogrid-feature-%e2%80%93-personal-server-images/#comment-1833</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sheehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gogrid.com/?p=908#comment-1833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks! We definitely want to keep that love coming! Be sure to spread the word! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! We definitely want to keep that love coming! Be sure to spread the word! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sheehan</title>
		<link>http://blog.gogrid.com/2009/04/22/planning-for-the-new-gogrid-feature-%e2%80%93-personal-server-images/#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sheehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gogrid.com/?p=908#comment-1834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What type of GoGrid server would you want to use this on? For Windows, you might try ultraISO to mount it, but I&#039;m not sure how it would work. If you do try it, please let me know how it goes. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What type of GoGrid server would you want to use this on? For Windows, you might try ultraISO to mount it, but I&#039;m not sure how it would work. If you do try it, please let me know how it goes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sheehan</title>
		<link>http://blog.gogrid.com/2009/04/22/planning-for-the-new-gogrid-feature-%e2%80%93-personal-server-images/#comment-1832</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sheehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gogrid.com/?p=908#comment-1832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have a liveCD, could you not mount it within a GoGrid server? I have not personally tried that but it might be something interesting to test. You might not get great performance from it. 
 
Currently we don&#039;t have a way to deploy your own customized base OS but we are considering many different option for future development. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a liveCD, could you not mount it within a GoGrid server? I have not personally tried that but it might be something interesting to test. You might not get great performance from it. </p>
<p>Currently we don&#039;t have a way to deploy your own customized base OS but we are considering many different option for future development. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sheehan</title>
		<link>http://blog.gogrid.com/2009/04/22/planning-for-the-new-gogrid-feature-%e2%80%93-personal-server-images/#comment-1831</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sheehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gogrid.com/?p=908#comment-1831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m looking into the answer re: your first question on IP and SSLs. 
 
Can you give me some details on the &quot;package-based&quot; deployment? What do you envision? 
 
Stay tuned regarding the Beta label. Yes, we do have an SLA that we have been fully honoring even though we are still in Beta. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m looking into the answer re: your first question on IP and SSLs. </p>
<p>Can you give me some details on the &quot;package-based&quot; deployment? What do you envision? </p>
<p>Stay tuned regarding the Beta label. Yes, we do have an SLA that we have been fully honoring even though we are still in Beta. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
