<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Navigating the Layers of the Cloud Computing Pyramid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gogrid.com/2009/03/26/navigating-the-layers-of-the-cloud-computing-pyramid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gogrid.com/2009/03/26/navigating-the-layers-of-the-cloud-computing-pyramid/</link>
	<description>&#34;Complex Infrastructure Made Easy™&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:20:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sheehan</title>
		<link>http://blog.gogrid.com/2009/03/26/navigating-the-layers-of-the-cloud-computing-pyramid/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sheehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gogrid.com/?p=803#comment-1482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@samj, 
No offense taken. When I originally coined the idea, the vision was that, like a pyramid, you have to build from the ground up. You have to start with a foundation. So, I viewed raw infrastructure as that foundation that can be built on top of. I do agree with you about the upside down pyramid, in fact, in some of our presentations, we do call that out and actually show the pyramid flipped to signify quantity. 
I hope you follow that line of reasoning. I&#039;m always open to suggestions though. 
Thanks, 
Michael ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@samj,<br />
No offense taken. When I originally coined the idea, the vision was that, like a pyramid, you have to build from the ground up. You have to start with a foundation. So, I viewed raw infrastructure as that foundation that can be built on top of. I do agree with you about the upside down pyramid, in fact, in some of our presentations, we do call that out and actually show the pyramid flipped to signify quantity.<br />
I hope you follow that line of reasoning. I&#039;m always open to suggestions though.<br />
Thanks,<br />
Michael </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samj</title>
		<link>http://blog.gogrid.com/2009/03/26/navigating-the-layers-of-the-cloud-computing-pyramid/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>samj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gogrid.com/?p=803#comment-1481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No offense intended, but is it not a little too convenient for an infrastructure provider to push a pyramid model where infrastructure is what half a dozen times larger than the top &quot;Application&quot; layer? I see no justification for this imbalance whatsoever and could well present an argument for an &quot;upside-down triangle&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense intended, but is it not a little too convenient for an infrastructure provider to push a pyramid model where infrastructure is what half a dozen times larger than the top &quot;Application&quot; layer? I see no justification for this imbalance whatsoever and could well present an argument for an &quot;upside-down triangle&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
