<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Computing on &quot;Cloud Nine&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gogrid.com/2008/03/18/computing-on-cloud-nine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gogrid.com/2008/03/18/computing-on-cloud-nine/</link>
	<description>&#34;Control in the Cloud™&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:49:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Coffman</title>
		<link>http://blog.gogrid.com/2008/03/18/computing-on-cloud-nine/comment-page-1/#comment-960</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Coffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 03:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gogrid.com/2008/03/18/computing-on-cloud-nine/#comment-960</guid>
		<description>[...] Computing on &#8220;Cloud Nine&#8221; &#124; GoGrid Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Computing on &#8220;Cloud Nine&#8221; | GoGrid Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sheehan</title>
		<link>http://blog.gogrid.com/2008/03/18/computing-on-cloud-nine/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sheehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 22:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gogrid.com/2008/03/18/computing-on-cloud-nine/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>@t

Haha! Yes, you are right. Since this post, we have slightly redefined our message to &quot;control in the cloud&quot; so still working with the adjectives (both positive and negative) but putting more of a tangibility on it through the control aspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@t</p>
<p>Haha! Yes, you are right. Since this post, we have slightly redefined our message to &#8220;control in the cloud&#8221; so still working with the adjectives (both positive and negative) but putting more of a tangibility on it through the control aspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t</title>
		<link>http://blog.gogrid.com/2008/03/18/computing-on-cloud-nine/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 21:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gogrid.com/2008/03/18/computing-on-cloud-nine/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>well, i guess what comes to mind when one does word associations often depends on personality and mood.

some words that come to my mind:

fluffy
white 
blue
clean
high
refreshing
strong
eternal
mysterious
beautiful
heaven</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, i guess what comes to mind when one does word associations often depends on personality and mood.</p>
<p>some words that come to my mind:</p>
<p>fluffy<br />
white<br />
blue<br />
clean<br />
high<br />
refreshing<br />
strong<br />
eternal<br />
mysterious<br />
beautiful<br />
heaven</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sheehan</title>
		<link>http://blog.gogrid.com/2008/03/18/computing-on-cloud-nine/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sheehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gogrid.com/2008/03/18/computing-on-cloud-nine/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>@verycloudy,

Good comments. I appreciate them. You are right though in many aspects. The name of the product (GoGrid) was decided on over a year ago (given that a computing grid, so to speak, powers the service). And yes, our product does fall under the &quot;cloud computing&quot; umbrella in many areas (like you mention).
When I wrote this post (even if just a month ago), the term &quot;cloud computing&quot; was just starting to buzz. Now it is almost mainstream.  The product is different though from that of Amazon, better in many aspects. Think of it as &quot;hosting in the cloud&quot; with the differentiator being that we are a hosting provider and know the business.
I&#039;m sure our marketing position will change over time. I wish we had that crystal ball to help guide us. We are not isolating...we are in the &quot;sweet spot&quot; between the cloud and traditional hosting (at least that is how I define it now).
Thanks again for your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@verycloudy,</p>
<p>Good comments. I appreciate them. You are right though in many aspects. The name of the product (GoGrid) was decided on over a year ago (given that a computing grid, so to speak, powers the service). And yes, our product does fall under the &#8220;cloud computing&#8221; umbrella in many areas (like you mention).<br />
When I wrote this post (even if just a month ago), the term &#8220;cloud computing&#8221; was just starting to buzz. Now it is almost mainstream.  The product is different though from that of Amazon, better in many aspects. Think of it as &#8220;hosting in the cloud&#8221; with the differentiator being that we are a hosting provider and know the business.<br />
I&#8217;m sure our marketing position will change over time. I wish we had that crystal ball to help guide us. We are not isolating&#8230;we are in the &#8220;sweet spot&#8221; between the cloud and traditional hosting (at least that is how I define it now).<br />
Thanks again for your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: verycloudy</title>
		<link>http://blog.gogrid.com/2008/03/18/computing-on-cloud-nine/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>verycloudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gogrid.com/2008/03/18/computing-on-cloud-nine/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Dude - you are fighting the wrong battle - You are building a cloud your are providing the elasticity (or on demand) capabilities, you are providing a pay as you go model - you are providing an infrastructure that facilitates deployments and common patterns - you are providing a service - and yet you pick a name for your company that only represents one of the use cases (grid is just one use case of many for cloud computing, and it is a bit of the past) and you choose to isolate yourself from the big guns like Amazon, Google, IBM, and HP - jump on the bandwagon and then differentiate yourself -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude &#8211; you are fighting the wrong battle &#8211; You are building a cloud your are providing the elasticity (or on demand) capabilities, you are providing a pay as you go model &#8211; you are providing an infrastructure that facilitates deployments and common patterns &#8211; you are providing a service &#8211; and yet you pick a name for your company that only represents one of the use cases (grid is just one use case of many for cloud computing, and it is a bit of the past) and you choose to isolate yourself from the big guns like Amazon, Google, IBM, and HP &#8211; jump on the bandwagon and then differentiate yourself -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
